SCCJR Response to Scottish Government Consultation on Transforming Parole Scotland

Published: March 2019

SCCJR welcomes the opportunity to comment in response to this Scottish Government consultation. Our submission focuses on the following key points:

1. We advocate further consideration and discussion of the purpose of the parole system in Scotland. Its future development could formally encompass two purposes: (a) risk assessment and public safety, and (b) enabling desistance and re/integration.

2. We support and advocate the independence and impartiality of the Parole Board for Scotland.

3. Victim support, notification and communication are important throughout criminal justice processes, including parole. However, we do not endorse proposals which would allow victims undue influence in parole decision-making, or give them the impression that they had such influence.

4. Improved communication about parole should be a priority in Scotland. Clear, meaningful communication with people in prison and with victims and survivors may be associated with increased perceptions of legitimacy and procedural fairness. Across Scotland, a more community-engaged communications and education strategy might help to proactively raise awareness of parole and the Parole Board for Scotland.

This submission was provided by Prof Fergus McNeill, Dr Marguerite Schinkel and Dr Hannah Graham on behalf of SCCJR.

Authors / Editors

Dr Hannah Graham

University of Stirling

Prof Fergus McNeill

University of Glasgow

Dr Marguerite Schinkel

University of Glasgow

Research Themes

Punishment, Citizenship and Communities